When the Intervenor Funding Project Act (IFPA) expired in 1996 there was concern that access to environmental justice would be seriously affected in Ontario and there is growing evidence that this has happened. Under IFPA, environmental groups and individuals were able to better contribute to tribunal hearings under the Environment Assessment Act and other laws because of financial assistance provided to them. We argue that participant and intervenor funding for participation in approval processes such as those created by the Environmental Protection Act, Environmental Bill of Rights, the Planning Act, the Endangered Species Act, 2007 and the Green Energy and Green Economy Act, 2009 would be beneficial and promote better decision making by government ministries and proponents. Early participation in planning can avoid surprises and controversies for decision-makers at later stages in the approval process.
Funding for Public Participation and Access to Justice: Where Are We in 2011?
August 17th, 2011 by Iler Campbell LLPSimilar Posts
- David McRobert and Paula Boutis Propose an Ontario Participant and Intervenor Funding ActJanuary 30, 2012
- The costs of hiding environmental informationApril 26, 2012
- Wither Ontario’s Endangered Species?January 12, 2012
- Federal Court finds Canadian government failed to protect species at riskMarch 28, 2014
- Paula Boutis in the OBA’s EnvironewsJuly 14, 2011
- Important Environmental Law Amendments in the Ontario 2012 budget billApril 17, 2012