Changes to the Residential Tenancies Act protecting tenants from violence and abuse come into force September 6: new tenant rights and landlord responsibilities

August 23rd, 2016 by Claudia Pedrero

On September 6, 2016, changes to the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (RTA) will come into force as a result of Bill 132, the Sexual Violence and Harrassment Action Plan Act.

In short, these amendments will allow tenants concerned for their safety or that of a child to give only 28 days notice to terminate their tenancy. The changes also impose serious responsibilities on landlords to keep information confidential.

These legislative changes come on the heels of the 2015 provincial government campaign “It’s Never Okay: An Action Plan to Stop Sexual Violence and Harassment”, intended to illustrate the government’s no‑tolerance stance on sexual violence, sexual harassment and domestic violence. Stemming from this, Bill 132, introduced by Ontario’s Minister for Women’s Issues, amends six provincial statutes to make Ontario’s laws more consistent with a zero‑tolerance position.

The changes to the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 are aimed at ensuring the safety of survivors of sexual violence and removing financial barriers to help ensure survivors of harassment and violence can leave unsafe living environments quickly.

A New, Shorter Termination Period

The RTA will soon allow tenants who have concerns for their safety or the safety of a child living in the household, to give 28 days notice to terminate their tenancy. This is down from the current requirement to give 60 days notice for most tenancies. The changes apply to monthly, yearly, and fixed‑term leases.

To end their tenancy on short notice, tenants will have to provide their landlords with a restraining order, access order or peace bond issued within the last 90 days, and a signed statement stating they or their child has experienced domestic or sexual abuse. For a complete list of the types of orders that can accompany a tenant’s statement see s.47.3(1) of the RTA’s new provisions.

Landlord Confidentiality Requirements

Under the new RTA rules, a landlord who receives a notice to terminate a tenancy on the basis described above is obligated to hold that information in strict confidence. A landlord must pay special attention to protecting the privacy of a tenant who reports abuse or violence to ensure the tenant’s safety. For example, when communicating with the tenant regarding move‑out, the landlord must contact the tenant directly, not send correspondence to the unit nor disclose to co‑tenants that notice was given. Also, sharing information about the tenant’s notice or supporting documentation with a superintendent, property manager or agent of the landlord is strictly on a need‑to‑know basis. Violating a landlord’s confidentiality obligations will be an offence under the RTA, which can result in a fine of up to $25,000 for an individual and up to $100,00 for a corporation, and/or an order for damages against the landlord from the Landlord and Tenant Board.

The legislative changes will also restrict a landlord from advertising or showing the unit to prospective tenants until after the tenant who gave the notice vacates.

Do these Changes Apply to Non‑Profit Co‑operative Housing Organizations?

The new, shorter termination notice option that will soon be available to tenants under the RTA, will not be available to members of housing co‑operatives.

The Ontario Co‑operative Corporations Act, 1990 (the CCA), not the RTA, governs the procedure for co‑op members wishing to give up their membership and occupancy rights, a procedure that is usually stated also in the co‑op’s occupancy by‑law.

Under Section 171.8.1 of the CCA, members are required to give at least 60 days written notice to the co‑op of their intention to terminate occupancy rights and membership. If a member vacates their unit before the end of the 60‑day notice period, the co‑op is entitled to re‑possess the unit, but the member who left is obliged to pay housing charges until the end of the notice period.  However, co‑op boards can always consider waiving the notice requirement if they feel it makes sense in the circumstances.

This exemption could result in the unintended outcome of making it more difficult for co‑op members to quickly and safely leave an unsafe living environment when necessary.

Co‑operatives facing a request to withdraw where the board knows or suspects that violence or harassment forms the basis for the withdrawal should likely consult a legal representative.

Tenants & Housing Providers Take Note

These amendments to the RTA will soon affect tenants and landlords across the province. Everyone should be aware of their rights and responsibilities when they come into force.

Privacy compromised: Legal rights and protections in Canada

August 4th, 2016 by Michael Hackl

This article was first published on rabble.ca

Privacy and secrecy are two interrelated concepts that raise a great many legal and ethical questions, with few easy answers. A recent example of the interplay between these concepts comes from the recent misuse of surveillance video by a liquor store employee. To set the stage, we have to go back to 2013, when a nasty verbal altercation between a feminist activist and men’s rights supporters at an event at the University of Toronto was recorded and uploaded to the Internet. The online response was truly appalling, as the woman involved received numerous serious threats. The level and nature of the abuse (including death and rape threats) was so egregious that she withdrew from her advocacy work, and instead tried to disappear from public attention.

Continue reading “Privacy compromised: Legal rights and protections in Canada”

CHFT Diversity Scholarships a rousing success

July 7th, 2016 by Iler Campbell
Past and present CHFT Diversity Scholarship winners join CHFT ED Tom Clement on stage at the St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts, June 29.

Past and present CHFT Diversity Scholarship winners join CHFT ED Tom Clement on stage at the St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts, June 29

When leaders at the Co-operative Housing Federation of Toronto first got the idea of giving out scholarships to deserving co-op members, their goal was one scholarship a year. They blew past that goal in no time at all. Since launching the CHFT Diversity Scholarships in 2004 they’ve assisted 260 students with their post-secondary education. The scholarships emphasize community involvement and commitment to diversity.

Iler Campbell is proud to be among the over 60 companies, organizations and individuals which together have donated over $1.2 million to help make this happen. College and university partners have granted a further $300,000. Several of our staff had the privilege of attending this year’s scholarship event at the St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts on June 29 which saw awards given out to this year’s 28 winners.

The success of this project has led to its recent expansion across Canada. In partnership with CHF Canada, a further $200,000 in scholarships have been given out to students living in co-ops in Ontario, British Columbia, Manitoba and Nova Scotia.

Alberta parents ‘morally blameworthy’ in son’s death: The moral dimension of alternative health care

June 30th, 2016 by Celia Chandler

This article was first published on rabble.ca

Last April, a jury found David and Collet Stephan guilty of “failing to provide the necessaries of life,” under section 215 of the Criminal Code, when their nearly 19-month-old son Ezekiel died in March 2012 of meningitis. Rather than pursuing traditional health care for their son, they made a series of decisions about his health care from February 27, 2012 — the day little Ezekial’s symptoms emerged ‑‑ through to the evening of March 13, 2012, when he stopped breathing and they called 911. Those decisions involved treating him with, among other things, hot peppers, garlic, onions and horseradish, despite a nurse family friend suggesting his symptoms might point to meningitis. Their defence at trial was that they had pursued a legitimate, alternative course of treatment.

Continue reading “Alberta parents ‘morally blameworthy’ in son’s death: The moral dimension of alternative health care”

New Accessible Customer Service Standards come into force July 1st. Are you ready?

June 22nd, 2016 by Katie Douglas

On July 1, 2016, the Accessible Customer Service Standards under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (the AODA) are changing. The changes apply to all organizations in Ontario with one or more employees that provide goods or services to the public.

The AODA is organized into five ‘standards’: customer service, information and communications, transportation, employment, and the design of public spaces. These standards are being phased in gradually and will be fully implemented in 2025. We’ve previously written about the new employment standards coming into force under the AODA in 2017. Those changes apply to all organizations with fewer than 50 employees. Read up on them here.

Below is a brief summary of the changes coming July 1st under the Customer Service Standard. Organizations with questions or which are unsure if they are meeting their obligations under the AODA are encouraged to contact us. Continue reading “New Accessible Customer Service Standards come into force July 1st. Are you ready?”

Introducing new lawyer, Katie Douglas

June 21st, 2016 by Iler Campbell

Katie Douglas has articled with us for the last year and we’re very pleased that she’s agreed to stay on as a new  lawyer – she is a great fit for the firm, as those of you who’ve met her will surely agree.  Sharp eyed readers of our blog should recognize her name as one of our regular authors. For more on Katie, take a look at her profile.